site stats

Joffe & co pty ltd v cir 1946 ad

WebSouthern African Legal Information Institute http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZATC/2024/3.pdf

The Port Elizabeth Electric Tramway case: Is the meaning ascribed …

WebPE Electric Tramway Co Ltd v CIR states that compensation paid to the family of a dependent will amount to an expense that is incurred in the production of income + Expenses must be incurred to produce an income (expenses incurred to produce exempt income are not deductible) + expenditure attached to the performance of a business … WebPyott Ltd v CIR . 1944 AD 128, 13 SATC 121 . Rhodesia Metals Ltd (In Liquidation) v COT . 1938 AD 282, 9 SATC 363 . Richmond Estates Pty (Ltd), CIR v . 1956 (1) SA 602 (A), 20 SATC 355 . Silverglen Investments (Pty) Ltd, SIR v . 1969 (1) SA 365 (A), 30 SATC 199 . Soldier v COT. 1943 SR 130 . St Lucia Usines Co v Treasurer of St Lucia . 1924 93 ... the ship porthleven cornwall https://starlinedubai.com

IN THE TAX COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT CAPE TOWN) …

Web22 okt. 2024 · InJoffe and Co (Pty) Ltd v CIR1946 AD 157 the taxpayer, a constructioncompany, incurred liability for damages and legal costs as a result of the deathof a plumber. The taxpayer argued that of the damages were not deductible as(2013) 130 THE SOUTH AFRICAN LAW JOURNAL320 expenditure; they were deductible as a loss. Webproduced income or was directly linked to income. In Joffe & Co Ltd v Commissioner for Inland Revenue, 1946 AD 157, Watermeyer J held (at 163) that – “All expenditure, … WebJoffe & Co (Pty) Ltd v CIR1946 AD 157 says that a deduction must pass both the positiveand negative tests. 4.1.2.1.‘Carrying on any trade ’: You need to determine when … the ship porlock weir somerset

Southern African Legal Information Institute

Category:Leading Tax Cases – Organised By Subject Matter – The Taxpayer

Tags:Joffe & co pty ltd v cir 1946 ad

Joffe & co pty ltd v cir 1946 ad

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter …

http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/1990/157.html http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2011/94.html

Joffe & co pty ltd v cir 1946 ad

Did you know?

WebJoffe & Co Ltd v Commissioner for Inland Revenue 1946. AD 157 at 166-7), and such consideration may be. important when it comes to applying the proviso in (v), where the … http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZATC/2010/1.pdf

Web哪里可以找行业研究报告?三个皮匠报告网的最新栏目每日会更新大量报告,包括行业研究报告、市场调研报告、行业分析报告、外文报告、会议报告、招股书、白皮书、世界500强企业分析报告以及券商报告等内容的更新,通过最新栏目,大家可以快速找到自己想要的内容。 WebCIR v South Behar Railway Co Ltd, 12 TC 657. CIR v Indosuez W.I Carr Securities Ltd (Carr), Inland Rev Appeal, no 5 of2001. CIT, Bombay Presidency & Aden v Chunlilal B Mehta of Bombay, 1938, 6 ITR 521. Cohen v CIR, 1946 AD 174; 13 SATC 362. Cooper v Cadwalader, 1904, 5 TC 101 . COT v Tuck, 1988, 3 SA 819 (A). COT v William Dunn & …

Webprofit-making test is the sole test. In Berea Park Avenue Properties (Pty) Ltd v CIR (1995 2 SA 11, 57 SATC 167) it is clear that ... using land as stock-in-trade; John Bell & Co (Pty) Limited v SIR 1976 4 SA 415 (A ... (fixed property); Berea Park Avenue Properties (Pty) Limited v CIR 1995 2 SA 411 (AD), 57 SATC 167 – profit-making scheme ... WebJoffe & Co (Pty) Ltd v CIR1946 AD 157 says that a deduction must pass both the positiveand negative tests. 4.1.2.1.‘Carrying on any trade ’: You need to determine when a taxpayer is a trader. If there are any suspect trades, then in terms of section 20A, they will be ‘ring-fenced’ and the deductions will be specifically deducted from the …

Webper Corbett AJA in Stone v Secretary for Inland Revenue 1974 (3) SA 584. (A) at 592H. As it was put in New State Areas Ltd v Commissioner for Inland Revenue 1946 AD 610 at 627, it is necessary to ascertain the true legal nature of the transactions which gave rise to the losses. The true legal nature of the transactions which gave rise

http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/1990/138.pdf my snohomish wedding tourWebCIR v Cactus Investments (Pty) Ltd 1996 (TPD), 60 SATC 141. 52 CIR v Cactus Investments (Pty) Ltd60 SATC 141. 52 CIR v Delfos 1933 AD 242, 6 SATC 92 66 CIR v George Forest Timber Co Ltd 1924 AD 516, 1 SATC 20 21 CIR v Peoples Stores (Walvis Bay) (Pty) Ltd 1990 (2) SA 353 (A), 52 SATC 9 66 ... New StateAreas LtdvCIR 1946 AD … my snipping tool is missingWebIn Joffe & Co (Pty) Ltd v CIR [1946]13 SATC 354, the taxpayer company carried on business as engineers in reinforced concrete. A concrete structure erected by the … my snohomish santaWeb1 CIR v Lever Brothers and Unilever Ltd 1946 AD 441. 2 South African Income Tax Act 58 of 1962. 3 The term “practical man” is a problematic relic of historical sexism. Although the sexed language of this concept would likely be interpreted to include both sexes, this would not always have been the case. my snipping tool is not working windows 11Web[156] Joffe and Co (Pty) Ltd v CIR 1946 AD 157, 13 SATC 354 [157] COT v Cathcart 1965 (1) SA 507 (SRAD), 27 SATC 1, 1965 Taxpayer 28 [158] COT v Rendle 1965 (1) SA 59 … my snood game won\\u0027t openWebIn the case of Joffe v CIR7 (referred to as the Joffe case), the court held that the payment of damages was not deductible. In brief, the facts of the case were as follows: the … my snipping tool won\u0027t openWebJoffe and Co (Pty) Ltd v CIR 1946 AD 157 the taxpayer, a construction company, incurred liability for damages and legal costs as a result of the death … the ship porthleven webcam